<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Design Dialogues &#187; Human Experience</title>
	<atom:link href="http://designdialogues.com/tag/user-experience/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://designdialogues.com</link>
	<description>Reflections on the future from a point in present</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2012 13:10:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Experience research: Making Sense of Sensemakers?</title>
		<link>http://designdialogues.com/is-experience-design-making-sense-of-sensemaking/</link>
		<comments>http://designdialogues.com/is-experience-design-making-sense-of-sensemaking/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2010 14:01:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Designdialogues</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Design research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sensemaking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wu Wei]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Experience]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://designdialogues.com/?p=645</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Consider design research &#8211; is it a discipline or no? Consider design researchers &#8211; researchers or are we really design consultants? A discipline has a body of knowledge, and a clear way of contributing to literature so that we know what we know.  A real discipline has a theoretical base, and ways of using that <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://designdialogues.com/is-experience-design-making-sense-of-sensemaking/">Experience research: Making Sense of Sensemakers?</a></span>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://designdialogues.com/is-experience-design-making-sense-of-sensemaking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Making Sense of Sensemaking</title>
		<link>http://designdialogues.com/why-sensemaking/</link>
		<comments>http://designdialogues.com/why-sensemaking/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 02:53:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Designdialogues</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sensemaking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wu Wei]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cognitive Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Collaborative sensemaking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Experience]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://designdialogues.com/?p=633</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Dr. Brenda Dervin presented a lecture and workshop at University of Toronto&#8217;s KMDI, kicking off the Making Sense Of series led by professor Peter Pennefather, KMDI outreach director. Peter and I hosted Brenda as befitting this first session in a series of workshops on &#8220;how we make sense&#8221; in several different domains. What&#8217;s new is <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://designdialogues.com/why-sensemaking/">Making Sense of Sensemaking</a></span>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://designdialogues.com/why-sensemaking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What is our &#8220;Standard of Care&#8221; for Design?</title>
		<link>http://designdialogues.com/what-is-our-standard-of-care-for-design/</link>
		<comments>http://designdialogues.com/what-is-our-standard-of-care-for-design/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 20:44:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Designdialogues</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Human Values]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wu Wei]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Design for Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Experience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social systems design]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://designdialogues.com/?p=561</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Designers and people in the caring professions may have different and valid ways to think about caring and systems. On the Wenovski design community a wide-ranging discussion involves the question of designing &#8220;systems that care.&#8221; I take a position that we can care for systems practices, but systems will not perform as caring agents. (We <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://designdialogues.com/what-is-our-standard-of-care-for-design/">What is our &#8220;Standard of Care&#8221; for Design?</a></span>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://designdialogues.com/what-is-our-standard-of-care-for-design/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Designing for Circles of Care</title>
		<link>http://designdialogues.com/483/</link>
		<comments>http://designdialogues.com/483/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 20:42:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Designdialogues</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Human Values]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wu Wei]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Design for Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Experience]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://designdialogues.com/?p=483</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Posted from Designing for Care blog on the Rosenfeld site.</p> <p>Designing for Care introduces the framing, if not the framework yet, of integrating design practices within healthcare as a legitimate practice of care. We are already both direct and complementary healthcare professionals. We care and provide care, both personally and professionally.</p> <p>There are many notions <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://designdialogues.com/483/">Designing for Circles of Care</a></span>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://designdialogues.com/483/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Designing for Care</title>
		<link>http://designdialogues.com/designing-for-care/</link>
		<comments>http://designdialogues.com/designing-for-care/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 14:15:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Designdialogues</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Wu Wei]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare informatics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Experience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Systems thinking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://designdialogues.com/?p=476</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Reposted from the Rosenfeld book site / author blog.</p> <p>I am inviting experienced designers (and professionals and administrators) to review and advise the course of a new book, Design for Care. Interested and interesting people can register on the book&#8217;s community site at designforcare.com.</p> <p>Healthcare is a sector of complex interconnected systems. If we act <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://designdialogues.com/designing-for-care/">Designing for Care</a></span>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://designdialogues.com/designing-for-care/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

