<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Design Dialogues &#187; Transformation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://designdialogues.com/tag/transformation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://designdialogues.com</link>
	<description>Reflections on the future from a point in present</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 20:44:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Convivial Design for the American Breakdown</title>
		<link>http://designdialogues.com/convivial-design-for-a-new-decade-2/</link>
		<comments>http://designdialogues.com/convivial-design-for-a-new-decade-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 01:58:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Designdialogues</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Wu Wei]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cultural Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social values]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transformation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://designdialogues.com/?p=572</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Part II.   Human-Scale Tools for Change</p> <p>While many authors recently warned of the consequences of an ideology of unfettered growth, including Ronald Wright, Jared Diamond, George Monbiot, and Thomas Homer-Dixon), philosopher/priest Ivan Illich warned us 40 years ago.  He foresaw a collapse of the post-industrial economy, which did not happen then. Illich proposed that autonomous, <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://designdialogues.com/convivial-design-for-a-new-decade-2/">Convivial Design for the American Breakdown</a></span>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://designdialogues.com/convivial-design-for-a-new-decade-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who will we be when Design grows up?</title>
		<link>http://designdialogues.com/convivial-design-for-a-new-decade/</link>
		<comments>http://designdialogues.com/convivial-design-for-a-new-decade/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 01:55:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Designdialogues</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Wu Wei]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Design Thinking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transformation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://designdialogues.com/?p=573</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The new year often finds blogs and commentators concerned with the memes and themes of the oncoming era hurtling toward us. Participating as I do in the more &#8220;abstract&#8221; design communities (e.g., experience, anthro, service design, strategic innovation, interaction, information architecture) I observe a lot of unproductive self-definition.  This takes the form of pronouncements about <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://designdialogues.com/convivial-design-for-a-new-decade/">Who will we be when Design grows up?</a></span>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://designdialogues.com/convivial-design-for-a-new-decade/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Design Leadership for Problem Systems</title>
		<link>http://designdialogues.com/design-leadership-for-problem-systems/</link>
		<comments>http://designdialogues.com/design-leadership-for-problem-systems/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 18:40:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Designdialogues</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Human Values]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wu Wei]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cultural Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transformation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://designdialogues.com/?p=371</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The full article is currently on Social Design, so first let me send readers to Joana&#8217;s stunning new design site.  Here I&#8217;ll recap the central theme of Design Leadership for Problem Systems.</p> <p>The design industry grew rapidly in the 20th century, by satisfying the massive and growing needs of consumer products, industrial systems, and a <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://designdialogues.com/design-leadership-for-problem-systems/">Design Leadership for Problem Systems</a></span>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://designdialogues.com/design-leadership-for-problem-systems/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Toronto 2.0 &#8211; Becoming a wired participatory polity</title>
		<link>http://designdialogues.com/toronto-20-becoming-a-wired-participatory-polity/</link>
		<comments>http://designdialogues.com/toronto-20-becoming-a-wired-participatory-polity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 19:00:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Designdialogues</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Wu Wei]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Participatory Democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social values]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transformation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://designdialogues.com/?p=319</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Today&#8217;s Globe &#38; Mail reports on ChangeCamp.</p> <p>What is ChangeCamp? It is the application of &#8216;the long tail&#8217; to public policy. It is a long-held and false assumption that ordinary citizens don&#8217;t care about public policy. The statement isn&#8217;t, of itself, false. Many, many, many people truly don&#8217;t care that much. They want to live <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://designdialogues.com/toronto-20-becoming-a-wired-participatory-polity/">Toronto 2.0 &#8211; Becoming a wired participatory polity</a></span>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://designdialogues.com/toronto-20-becoming-a-wired-participatory-polity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who Transforms in Transformation?</title>
		<link>http://designdialogues.com/innovation-process-transformation-co-designed-outcome/</link>
		<comments>http://designdialogues.com/innovation-process-transformation-co-designed-outcome/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 00:19:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Designdialogues</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Transformation Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wu Wei]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social values]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transformation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wicked complexity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://designdialogues.com/?p=288</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>In the BusinessWeek blog, Nussbaum on Design packs all the goodies gathered over the years from “innovation” and drops them into “transformation.” This pronouncement led to well over a dozen responses in the Transforming Transformation Google groups, some of them pages in length. Comparing these responses with the replies to the cheerleading or briefer critical <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://designdialogues.com/innovation-process-transformation-co-designed-outcome/">Who Transforms in Transformation?</a></span>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://designdialogues.com/innovation-process-transformation-co-designed-outcome/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

