<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Design Dialogues &#187; Participatory Design</title>
	<atom:link href="http://designdialogues.com/tag/participatory-design/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://designdialogues.com</link>
	<description>Inquiries in design, complexity, &#38; collective wisdom</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 14:01:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>All Design is Redesign</title>
		<link>http://designdialogues.com/all-design-is-redesign/</link>
		<comments>http://designdialogues.com/all-design-is-redesign/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 18:32:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Designdialogues</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Wu Wei]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Design ecology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Design Thinking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Participatory Design]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redesignresearch.com/dialogues/?p=213</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>So now also says Bruno Latour, in a keynote lecture given at History of Design Society, Falmouth, September 2008 &#8220;A Cautious Prometheus? A Few Steps Toward a Philosophy of Design.&#8221;</p>
<p>The fourth advantage I see in the word “design” (in addition to its modesty, its attention to detail and the semiotic skills it always carries with it), <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://designdialogues.com/all-design-is-redesign/">All Design is Redesign</a></span>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://designdialogues.com/all-design-is-redesign/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dialogue as Participatory Design</title>
		<link>http://designdialogues.com/dialogue-as-participatory-design/</link>
		<comments>http://designdialogues.com/dialogue-as-participatory-design/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 20:32:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Designdialogues</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dialogic Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transformation Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cultural Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Design ecology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Participatory Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transformation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dialogicdesign.wordpress.com/2007/11/03/dialogue-as-participatory-design/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>(Insert standard excuses for blog slipping here).</p>
<p>Torch Partner Robin Uchida hosted the second year of Juice Dialogues at Ontario College of Art and Design, October 25-27.  Wit the theme of Making the Invisible Visible, I kicked off the Friday night session, followed by Gary Gray, founder of Carder  Gray agency. I was delighted to <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://designdialogues.com/dialogue-as-participatory-design/">Dialogue as Participatory Design</a></span>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://designdialogues.com/dialogue-as-participatory-design/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>On Seeing Design as Redesign</title>
		<link>http://designdialogues.com/on-seeing-design-as-redesign/</link>
		<comments>http://designdialogues.com/on-seeing-design-as-redesign/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 20:17:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Designdialogues</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Design ecology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Experience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Participatory Design]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dialogicdesign.wordpress.com/2007/09/05/on-seeing-design-as-redesign/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Peers in design practice understand the name &#8220;Redesign Research,&#8221; and get it. At least I think they do. Clients get it as well. And a slogan since 2001 that &#8220;All Design is Redesign.&#8221; I have found few other designers willing to join me on this &#8211; perhaps people think its a marketing slogan, but it really <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://designdialogues.com/on-seeing-design-as-redesign/">On Seeing Design as Redesign</a></span>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://designdialogues.com/on-seeing-design-as-redesign/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dialogue as unmediated design</title>
		<link>http://designdialogues.com/dialogue-as-unmediated-design/</link>
		<comments>http://designdialogues.com/dialogue-as-unmediated-design/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 00:39:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Designdialogues</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Dialogic Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Participatory Democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Participatory Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Systems thinking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wicked complexity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dialogicdesign.wordpress.com/2007/03/01/dialogue-as-unmediated-design/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Or at least, less-mediated design.  A goal and an inherent value of participatory design is that of engaging users directly in a design processes, to minimize the translation of features by designers. The goal of direct participation is not to reduce the cycle time incurred between cycles of user-centered design, prototyping, and user assessment, although <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://designdialogues.com/dialogue-as-unmediated-design/">Dialogue as unmediated design</a></span>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://designdialogues.com/dialogue-as-unmediated-design/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IDEO Smart Space &#8211; A transformation of what?</title>
		<link>http://designdialogues.com/ideo-smart-space-a-transformation-of-what/</link>
		<comments>http://designdialogues.com/ideo-smart-space-a-transformation-of-what/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 01:27:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Designdialogues</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Transformation Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Participatory Democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Participatory Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research Methods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wicked complexity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dialogicdesign.wordpress.com/2007/02/25/ideo-smart-space-a-transformation-of-what/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p class="HeadlineMagazine" style="margin-top:0;margin-bottom:5px;">IDEO’s Urban Pre-Planning</p>
<p class="HeadlineMagazine" style="margin-top:0;margin-bottom:5px;"> Can its “Smart Space” practice shake up the lumbering world of infrastructure, zoning, and public process?
IDEO gets so much press on their approach to architectural projects &#8211; perhaps because its a relatively new space for design, and few other firms are taking it on in the way they can. <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://designdialogues.com/ideo-smart-space-a-transformation-of-what/">IDEO Smart Space &#8211; A transformation of what?</a></span>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://designdialogues.com/ideo-smart-space-a-transformation-of-what/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
