<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Design Dialogues &#187; Organizational strategy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://designdialogues.com/tag/organizational-strategy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://designdialogues.com</link>
	<description>Reflections on the future from a point in present</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 20:44:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Guided by Values</title>
		<link>http://designdialogues.com/guided-by-values/</link>
		<comments>http://designdialogues.com/guided-by-values/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 19:54:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Designdialogues</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Wu Wei]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Organizational strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Organizational values]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://designdialogues.com/?p=494</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>In  the latest HBS Working Knowledge, Rosabeth Moss Kanter makes the case in SuperCorp: Values as Guidance System that an organization&#8217;s strategy is best steered by establishing a clear and committed foundation of values. Organizational commitments to a way of being, not the meaningless kind that sit flat on the wall plaques in most of <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://designdialogues.com/guided-by-values/">Guided by Values</a></span>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://designdialogues.com/guided-by-values/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Innovating as if your Future Depended on it.</title>
		<link>http://designdialogues.com/innovating-as-if-your-future-depended-on-it-y/</link>
		<comments>http://designdialogues.com/innovating-as-if-your-future-depended-on-it-y/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 02:35:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Designdialogues</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wu Wei]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Design Thinking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Organizational strategy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://designdialogues.com/?p=470</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>So we’re in an everlasting downturn and nobody is really sure what’s next in store for any industry, newspapers, broadcast, publishing, financial, automotive, retail, construction, food production, energy, healthcare. If the rational, reasonable Western world is in such a fit of uncertainty, we clearly need to be innovating our way forward.</p> <p>Designers have always been <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://designdialogues.com/innovating-as-if-your-future-depended-on-it-y/">Innovating as if your Future Depended on it.</a></span>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://designdialogues.com/innovating-as-if-your-future-depended-on-it-y/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Innovating in the eternal downturn</title>
		<link>http://designdialogues.com/innovating-in-the-eternal-downturn/</link>
		<comments>http://designdialogues.com/innovating-in-the-eternal-downturn/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 16:16:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Designdialogues</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wu Wei]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Organizational strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thrivability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://designdialogues.com/?p=459</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>You know we&#8217;re in a very unusual downdraft cycle when articles on keeping the faith with innovation during downturns remain popular. The perpetual (or is it eternal?) financial crisis has lasted long enough to sustain a cottage industry of books and workshops intended to help the waning innovator and entrepreneur. My colleague Walter Derzko in <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://designdialogues.com/innovating-in-the-eternal-downturn/">Innovating in the eternal downturn</a></span>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://designdialogues.com/innovating-in-the-eternal-downturn/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Values integrity: Leadership means keeping it real</title>
		<link>http://designdialogues.com/values-integrity-leadership-means-keeping-it-real/</link>
		<comments>http://designdialogues.com/values-integrity-leadership-means-keeping-it-real/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 21:53:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Designdialogues</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Human Values]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transformation Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wu Wei]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Authentic leadership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Organizational strategy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redesignresearch.com/dialogues/?p=229</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>One of the central distinctions in the US presidential election that I&#8217;ve seen is that of the candidate&#8217;s integrity with their stated and perceived virtues. Barack Obama has led an exemplary campaign, and unbiased observers (of which I cannot really claim to be) would notice that he has maintained a consistent focus on several distinct <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://designdialogues.com/values-integrity-leadership-means-keeping-it-real/">Values integrity: Leadership means keeping it real</a></span>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://designdialogues.com/values-integrity-leadership-means-keeping-it-real/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>OFF + ON</title>
		<link>http://designdialogues.com/off-on/</link>
		<comments>http://designdialogues.com/off-on/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 18:18:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Designdialogues</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wu Wei]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Design ecology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Knowledge strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Organizational strategy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redesignresearch.com/dialogues/?p=170</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>UK&#8217;s Trendwatching gives us OFF=ON. Everything offline takes on characteristics of the online (esp Web 2.0) world. Indeed this is a trend many of us have pushed with clients overly investing their brands in one medium/world or the other, but not both effectively. The primary vector in their article is mapping online features, design, and <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://designdialogues.com/off-on/">OFF + ON</a></span>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://designdialogues.com/off-on/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

