<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Design Dialogues &#187; Knowledge strategy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://designdialogues.com/tag/knowledge-strategy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://designdialogues.com</link>
	<description>Reflections on the future from a point in present</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2012 13:10:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>OFF + ON</title>
		<link>http://designdialogues.com/off-on/</link>
		<comments>http://designdialogues.com/off-on/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 18:18:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Designdialogues</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wu Wei]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Design ecology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Knowledge strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Organizational strategy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redesignresearch.com/dialogues/?p=170</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>UK&#8217;s Trendwatching gives us OFF=ON. Everything offline takes on characteristics of the online (esp Web 2.0) world. Indeed this is a trend many of us have pushed with clients overly investing their brands in one medium/world or the other, but not both effectively. The primary vector in their article is mapping online features, design, and <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://designdialogues.com/off-on/">OFF + ON</a></span>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://designdialogues.com/off-on/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Designing design in non-design organizations</title>
		<link>http://designdialogues.com/designing-design-in-non-design-organizations/</link>
		<comments>http://designdialogues.com/designing-design-in-non-design-organizations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 15:20:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Designdialogues</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Design ecology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Experience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Knowledge strategy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dialogicdesign.wordpress.com/?p=93</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Should designers embed with their clients?</p> <p>Designers have tied themselves closely to their clients since the early days of the Vatican. In design consulting, you must understand your clients&#8217; business to advise effectively. So we have to work closely with clients to understand their users/customers.</p> <p>We&#8217;ve done this since 2001 as a boutique research/design consulting <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://designdialogues.com/designing-design-in-non-design-organizations/">Designing design in non-design organizations</a></span>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://designdialogues.com/designing-design-in-non-design-organizations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Failure is a Matter of Timing</title>
		<link>http://designdialogues.com/failure-is-a-matter-of-timing/</link>
		<comments>http://designdialogues.com/failure-is-a-matter-of-timing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 21:18:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Designdialogues</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Information Architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Knowledge strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Organizational strategy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dialogicdesign.wordpress.com/?p=92</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>On Boxes and Arrows, Part II of We Tried to Warn You! is now up, with several great comments that are worth the visit. Boxes and Arrows is a truly beautiful and readable online publication, one that I recommend as an example of how to do things right. One of the core points in Part <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://designdialogues.com/failure-is-a-matter-of-timing/">Failure is a Matter of Timing</a></span>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://designdialogues.com/failure-is-a-matter-of-timing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Socializing Business Decisions</title>
		<link>http://designdialogues.com/socializing-business-decisions/</link>
		<comments>http://designdialogues.com/socializing-business-decisions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 01:16:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Designdialogues</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Knowledge strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Organizational strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Systems thinking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transformation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dialogicdesign.wordpress.com/2008/01/06/socializing-business-decisions/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>What are the most effective ways to coordinate organizational transformation? Theories and experiences differ widely. Nearly all schools of strategic transformation assume a top-down decisionmaking style that wreaks &#8220;transformation&#8221; like a plague of new process changes across the organization. When the dust settles, it&#8217;s often the case that it was just another re-org, and now <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://designdialogues.com/socializing-business-decisions/">Socializing Business Decisions</a></span>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://designdialogues.com/socializing-business-decisions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Socializing Knowledge Practices</title>
		<link>http://designdialogues.com/is-innovation-a-matter-of-socializing/</link>
		<comments>http://designdialogues.com/is-innovation-a-matter-of-socializing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 20:55:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Designdialogues</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Knowledge strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Organizational strategy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dialogicdesign.wordpress.com/2007/12/17/is-innovation-a-matter-of-socializing/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Yes, this was really about Innovation at first. But like authors that avoid the use of the verb &#8220;to be,&#8221; I am attempting to write about systematic product and systems design without using the &#8220;I&#8221; word. I&#8217;d like to write about creating a &#8220;Culture of Innovation,&#8221; but I agree with Peter Merholz and others who <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://designdialogues.com/is-innovation-a-matter-of-socializing/">Socializing Knowledge Practices</a></span>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://designdialogues.com/is-innovation-a-matter-of-socializing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

