<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Design Dialogues &#187; Design ecology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://designdialogues.com/tag/design-ecology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://designdialogues.com</link>
	<description>Inquiries in design, complexity, &#38; collective wisdom</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 14:01:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>What else might the eBook be?</title>
		<link>http://designdialogues.com/what-else-might-the-ebook-be/</link>
		<comments>http://designdialogues.com/what-else-might-the-ebook-be/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 15:32:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Designdialogues</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Information Ecology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wu Wei]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Add new tag]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cultural Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Design ecology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Information behavior]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://designdialogues.com/?p=240</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Since our University of Toronto eBooks User Experience study has been completed, its time to share what we found. But first, I&#8217;d like to compare some current progress between different eBook and future book research initiatives. I&#8217;m tracking projects such as OCAD&#8217;s SmartBook, the Institute for the Future of the Book, Dave Gray&#8217;s &#8220;unbook&#8221; collaborative, and <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://designdialogues.com/what-else-might-the-ebook-be/">What else might the eBook be?</a></span>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://designdialogues.com/what-else-might-the-ebook-be/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who really killed the American Car?</title>
		<link>http://designdialogues.com/who-really-killed-the-american-car/</link>
		<comments>http://designdialogues.com/who-really-killed-the-american-car/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 17:12:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Designdialogues</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Transformation Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wu Wei]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Design ecology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Organizational values]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://designdialogues.com/?p=243</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal">Perhaps it isn’t all about the product. Adam Hanft makes the point that clumsy marketing and mediocre corporate culture with no sense of its own creative force led to “a marketing failure, probably the biggest one in history. It takes years of monumental incompetence to squander the biggest, deepest love affair the American consumer has <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://designdialogues.com/who-really-killed-the-american-car/">Who really killed the American Car?</a></span>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://designdialogues.com/who-really-killed-the-american-car/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>All Design is Redesign</title>
		<link>http://designdialogues.com/all-design-is-redesign/</link>
		<comments>http://designdialogues.com/all-design-is-redesign/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 18:32:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Designdialogues</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Wu Wei]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Design ecology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Design Thinking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Participatory Design]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redesignresearch.com/dialogues/?p=213</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>So now also says Bruno Latour, in a keynote lecture given at History of Design Society, Falmouth, September 2008 &#8220;A Cautious Prometheus? A Few Steps Toward a Philosophy of Design.&#8221;</p>
<p>The fourth advantage I see in the word “design” (in addition to its modesty, its attention to detail and the semiotic skills it always carries with it), <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://designdialogues.com/all-design-is-redesign/">All Design is Redesign</a></span>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://designdialogues.com/all-design-is-redesign/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>OFF + ON</title>
		<link>http://designdialogues.com/off-on/</link>
		<comments>http://designdialogues.com/off-on/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 18:18:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Designdialogues</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wu Wei]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Design ecology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Knowledge strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Organizational strategy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redesignresearch.com/dialogues/?p=170</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>UK&#8217;s Trendwatching gives us OFF=ON. Everything offline takes on characteristics of the online (esp Web 2.0) world. Indeed this is a trend many of us have pushed with clients overly investing their brands in one medium/world or the other, but not both effectively. The primary vector in their article is mapping online features, design, and interaction <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://designdialogues.com/off-on/">OFF + ON</a></span>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://designdialogues.com/off-on/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Opportunity Overload</title>
		<link>http://designdialogues.com/opportunity-overload/</link>
		<comments>http://designdialogues.com/opportunity-overload/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 21:25:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Designdialogues</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Information Ecology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transformation Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cognitive Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Design ecology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Systems thinking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dialogicdesign.wordpress.com/?p=150</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Information overload has been with us since the dawn of electronic media. According to McLuhan&#8217;s theories (and Robert Logan&#8217;s recent enhancements to media theory), when we humans overextend a communications channel, we create a new one.  We create one commensurate with the increased volume and complexity of content that our culture generates. When we overwhelmed the <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://designdialogues.com/opportunity-overload/">Opportunity Overload</a></span>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://designdialogues.com/opportunity-overload/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
