<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Design Dialogues &#187; Cultural Design</title>
	<atom:link href="http://designdialogues.com/tag/cultural-design/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://designdialogues.com</link>
	<description>Inquiries in design, complexity, &#38; collective wisdom</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 14:01:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Convivial Design for the American Breakdown</title>
		<link>http://designdialogues.com/convivial-design-for-a-new-decade-2/</link>
		<comments>http://designdialogues.com/convivial-design-for-a-new-decade-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 01:58:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Designdialogues</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Wu Wei]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cultural Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social values]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transformation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://designdialogues.com/?p=572</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Part II.   Human-Scale Tools for Change</p>
<p>While many authors recently warned of the consequences of an ideology of unfettered growth, including Ronald Wright, Jared Diamond, George Monbiot, and Thomas Homer-Dixon), philosopher/priest Ivan Illich warned us 40 years ago.  He foresaw a collapse of the post-industrial economy, which did not happen then. Illich proposed that autonomous, creative citizens <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://designdialogues.com/convivial-design-for-a-new-decade-2/">Convivial Design for the American Breakdown</a></span>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://designdialogues.com/convivial-design-for-a-new-decade-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Intent and Content: Unbooking the Book</title>
		<link>http://designdialogues.com/intent-and-content-unbooking-the-book/</link>
		<comments>http://designdialogues.com/intent-and-content-unbooking-the-book/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 16:58:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Designdialogues</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Information Ecology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wu Wei]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cultural Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Experience]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://designdialogues.com/?p=413</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal">Industrial and communications designers, authors, new publishers, product innovators  -  Everyone is rethinking The Book in 2009. So then who owns the concept of the book, anyway? Publishers? Society at large? Those of us who say so? And if we say so, does said ownership prevent certain types of  innovation? What we don&#8217;t know about <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://designdialogues.com/intent-and-content-unbooking-the-book/">Intent and Content: Unbooking the Book</a></span>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://designdialogues.com/intent-and-content-unbooking-the-book/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Design Leadership for Problem Systems</title>
		<link>http://designdialogues.com/design-leadership-for-problem-systems/</link>
		<comments>http://designdialogues.com/design-leadership-for-problem-systems/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 18:40:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Designdialogues</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Human Values]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wu Wei]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cultural Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transformation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://designdialogues.com/?p=371</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The full article is currently on Social Design, so first let me send readers to Joana&#8217;s stunning new design site.  Here I&#8217;ll recap the central theme of Design Leadership for Problem Systems.</p>
<p>The design industry grew rapidly in the 20th century, by satisfying the massive and growing needs of consumer products, industrial systems, and a business ethos <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://designdialogues.com/design-leadership-for-problem-systems/">Design Leadership for Problem Systems</a></span>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://designdialogues.com/design-leadership-for-problem-systems/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Markets of Meaning (Find Portishead a Biz Model)</title>
		<link>http://designdialogues.com/markets-of-meaning-find-portishead-a-biz-model/</link>
		<comments>http://designdialogues.com/markets-of-meaning-find-portishead-a-biz-model/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 19:07:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Designdialogues</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Wu Wei]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cultural Design]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://designdialogues.com/?p=360</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Thanks to Alex Osterman via Twitter for suggesting this link to their appeal on Creative Commons:</p>
</p>
Help Portishead Find a New Business Model

<p>Portishead, an experimental-pop group and pioneers of the early 90s electronica movement, announced yesterday that they are now “free agents”, having completed their three record deal with Island Records. The band is looking at new ways <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://designdialogues.com/markets-of-meaning-find-portishead-a-biz-model/">Markets of Meaning (Find Portishead a Biz Model)</a></span>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://designdialogues.com/markets-of-meaning-find-portishead-a-biz-model/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What is the contribution of Design in a national economy?</title>
		<link>http://designdialogues.com/what-is-the-contribution-of-design-in-a-national-economy/</link>
		<comments>http://designdialogues.com/what-is-the-contribution-of-design-in-a-national-economy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 13:30:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Designdialogues</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Dialogic Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wu Wei]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cultural Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Participatory Democracy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://designdialogues.com/?p=322</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>OCAD&#8217;s president Sara Diamond advocates for a Canadian national design strategy in the Globe and Mail.</p>
<p>Design is essential to Canada&#8217;s science and technology strategy, which underlines the needs of markets in the developing and developed world for new inventions that make use of new and sustainable materials, medical technologies, ICT, digital media, and biotechnology. In realizing <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://designdialogues.com/what-is-the-contribution-of-design-in-a-national-economy/">What is the contribution of Design in a national economy?</a></span>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://designdialogues.com/what-is-the-contribution-of-design-in-a-national-economy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
