<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Innovation &#8211; Not Dead Yet!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://designdialogues.com/innovation-not-dead-yet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://designdialogues.com/innovation-not-dead-yet/</link>
	<description>Reflections on the future from a point in present</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2012 04:24:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Distinguishing Design for a New Decade &#171; Design Dialogues</title>
		<link>http://designdialogues.com/innovation-not-dead-yet/comment-page-1/#comment-95</link>
		<dc:creator>Distinguishing Design for a New Decade &#171; Design Dialogues</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 17:22:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://designdialogues.com/?p=285#comment-95</guid>
		<description>[...] the shift in design thinking from innovation to Transformation. I responded to this by suggesting innovation was not dead yet. Hundred of other commentators responded online or by linking, and so it had impact, whether or not [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the shift in design thinking from innovation to Transformation. I responded to this by suggesting innovation was not dead yet. Hundred of other commentators responded online or by linking, and so it had impact, whether or not [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

